Comparison of Lma Supreme and I-Gel In Short Surgical Procedures Under General Anaesthesia

Abstract

Background –
I-GEL and LMA supreme are single-use 2nd generation supraglottic airway devices. The
objectives of this study are to compare the number of attempts, ease, and time taken for
insertion and complications during usage of these devices.
Material and methodsThe randomized single-blinded prospective study was conducted with 60 patients of ASA
Grade 1 and 2 assigned into 2 groups undergoing short surgical procedures under general
anesthesia. The device was chosen according to the weight of the patient. We assessed the
mean time of insertion (in seconds), ease of insertion, no. of attempts of insertion, ease of
insertion of a gastric tube, and complications.
ResultsThe mean time of placement of I-gel was greater than LMA supreme. LMA supreme was
easily inserted in comparison to I-gel. Also, no. of attempts were more with I-GEL. There
was no incidence of desaturation, dental trauma, or laryngospasm in both groups.
Conclusion –
Both I-gel and LMA supreme provided a satisfactory and secure airway during short surgical
procedures under general anesthesia. LMA supreme has an edge over I-gel in being superior
to I gel in terms of shorter time taken for insertion, no. of attempts during anesthesia.